Posted
11/18/2006 03:14:00 PM
by Douglas
When is Starbuck's gonna learn? Stop selling hot drinks to
idiots.A Hancock County couple have filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, accusing a Fishers store of serving scalding hot chocolate that seriously burned their little girl.
Brennan ordered a child's hot chocolate with whipped cream and an adult hot chocolate without whipped cream at the drive-through. According to the lawsuit, Starbucks' policy is to serve child drinks at lower temperature than adult drinks to avoid kids getting burned.
Brennan handed her daughter the child drink, and as she pulled away from the window, it spilled into Rachel's lap.
What the hell is wrong with these people? She bought a product described as
hot chocolate. I can see how you could make a case if it was coffee or tea, because let's be frank, its thermal properties aren't included in the name. But
Hot chocolate? Pretty much know what you're getting with that one, even if you are retarded. She bought it, dropped it, and her kid got burned. How do they muster the balls to call a lawyer over that?