enthalpy

Tuesday, March 08, 2011


I love these pseudo-science wank-a-thons that want to prove whatever miserable hypothesis they've already agreed upon, but this one is pretty funny:
Some economists have argued that having kids is an economically silly investment; after all, it's cheaper to hire end-of-life care than to raise a child.
Let's be clear: You're stupid if end-of-life health care comes into the discussion of whether or not to have children. You're even stupider if you're my parents and this decision was the one that broke the tie. Sorry parents.
Here's how cognitive-dissonance theory works when applied to parenting: having kids is an economic and emotional drain. It should make those who have kids feel worse. Instead, parents glorify their lives. They believe that the financial and emotional benefits of having children are significantly higher than they really are.
Wow, what a princely summation. I think the same could be said for BMWs, iPhones, and Crocs. The difference being the time commitment involved.



Home