enthalpy

Thursday, March 23, 2006


I've said before, I don't have an abortion opinion. Except that I do. I find that I have to agree with Radley on this one (again). Male abortion. What a funny term. This is where the Left's agenda falls apart. A woman can have an abortion any time she wants, because, ya know, she wants one, but the father has not only no say in whether the mother has an abortion, but whether she doesn't have an abortion, which was the problem with this case.
A 25-year-old computer programmer in Michigan, Dubay wants to know why it is only women who have "reproductive rights." He is upset about having to pay child support for a baby he never wanted. Not only did his former girlfriend know he didn't want children, says Dubay, she had told him she was infertile. When she got pregnant nonetheless, he asked her to get an abortion or place the baby for adoption. She decided instead to keep her child and secured a court order requiring him to pay $500 a month in support.
Fair 'nuff. What's good for the gander is good for the goose, right?

I don't care how far on the left you are, but you can't say that it's a hate crime to say that "if a woman doesn't want a baby, then she shouldn't have sex" while saying the exact opposite thing to the man, in the form of forced settlements and wage garnishments. That's just not feasible in today's world of DNA testing and wage garnishing. Or should I say male wage garnishing.



Home